Results for “”

The only way to stop that nation is to shatter its capability of waging that war. Otherwise a lot of diplomacy will be done, but that country has already made its choice, and it will pursue it.

When you see Russian disinformation claiming that Zelensky does not want peace, and Russia striking our civilian infrastructure with missiles, these are two sides of the same attack.

If we were to design a theory of Ukraine's victory, I would formulate it in three words: an independent, sovereign and European Ukraine.

The West suffers from its own arrogance. Our friends in Paris, in Berlin, in London, even in the United States, always build their fundamental assumptions on the premise that they know Russia, that they have leverage on Russia, that they can control Russia, that they can moderate Russia.

He read different books. He does not believe in win-win.

It does not matter how hard things are today. If we give up, things will only get worse.

There will be more war as long as President Putin stays in the Kremlin.

Putin does not care about the price. He only cares about what will be written about him in the history books.

It takes Ukrainian blood, pain and life to make people in the West admit they were wrong about Russia.

When people say Ukrainians are unbroken, it is not true. We are broken. We are just not giving up.

The imposition of thingness and objecthood and selfhood and otherhood and motherhood is just our attempt to tell stories of a simple sort about how we best explain our universe. But our universe is obviously everything.

Disorders of consciousness, and psychopathology generally, can now be viewed through the lens of false inference.

They are using language; I use language; I am conscious; therefore the machine is conscious. It is a very plausible inference to make.

You can simulate the weather in silico and it is not actually raining. The computer is not in and of itself wet, whereas mortal computation would actually be wet, if you physically realise what is going on.

We are all natural-born scientists, with exactly the same curiosity under the hood. That is the thing that needs to be installed in large language models before you will get anywhere near AGI.

If you do not have that, and large language models do not have that, then you do not know what you do not know. You cannot do belief updating. All you can do is produce outputs for any given input.

You can read natural selection as nature's way of doing Bayesian model selection at a very slow timescale.

We are glued to the world through our senses, and our sensory information entrains and informs the inversion process that can be read as perceptual inference.

The illusion, or hypothesis, that you are you is quite a unique gift and quite a fragile gift, and it can go away.

You don't know anything. It's all inference, including that you are you and that you exist.

I'm not trying to craft a grand story so much as get stuff done.

I think, and I have thought for many months, or a year now, that this is as big as or bigger than the internet itself as a revolution in computing.

You don't need a cult of personality. You need a whole lot of talented engineers working together, with good communication and collaboration, to produce a great product.

If you're trying to fake that and compete with somebody who does it naturally, good luck.